TRACK CHAIRS
Alan Dennis
Kelley School of Business
Indiana University Bloomington
1309 East Tenth Street
Bloomington IN 47405
Tel: +1-812-855-2691
ardennis@iu.edu
Joe Valacich
University of Arizona
1130 E. Helen St.
McClelland Hall 430CC
Tucson, Arizona 85721-0108
Tel: +1-520-621-0035
valacich@arizona.edu
The Internet at Work and Play Track recognizes that the Internet has transformed the way we work, learn, and play. Our track focuses on the ways in which the Internet affects people, groups, organizations, and societies (e.g., markets, social networks), as well as fundamental issues in the development and operation of the Internet and Internet applications (e.g., security, open source).
This minitrack seeks to provide a platform to investigate how organizations simultaneously deal with the complexity generated by DT at different levels. DT goes beyond simple technology adoption, requiring new methods, models, and tools to enable data-driven business. These changes frequently imply new strategies, identities, new business models, and adapted capabilities to deal with people, technology, and processes that advocate new ways of management and change management. Recently, DT has been twinned with sustainability, named twin transformation, bringing organizations a sense of rethinking technology choices, work-life balance and other changes aiming to promote digital innovation and environmental progress and enhance human well-being in an intertwined transformation.
Theoretical, methodological, or applied papers are welcome. This year, we are explicitly inviting papers presenting a real case or cases in any activity sector, for example, papers on – strategies or tools helping organizations to deal with their DT; practices involved in DT; challenges during the transformation process, metrics and indicators adopted to measure the success or degree of DT; learning lessons on twin transformation or other relevant topics in the area. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
- DT challenges, drivers, adoption, and barriers
- DT human resources / technology / corporate strategies / sustainability
- DT key performance indicators / success factors/maturity
- Comparisons between industries and countries
- Impact on work and changing roles, e.g., Data Scientists, Data Citizens, Chief Digital Officers, etc.
- Frameworks of analyses such as dynamic capabilities, disruption, competitive advantage, value creation
We expect contributions that address relevant topics related to the DT and its impacts. Exchanges and interactions among authors during the conference will promote fruitful discussions and perhaps new collaborations. As DT becomes more theoretically developed, we believe this minitrack will continue to contribute to the evolution of this relevant research topic by promoting real cases that could help advance new theoretical knowledge and practical knowledge that can be developed into cases for both policy and teaching.
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Elaine Mosconi (Primary Contact)
Université de Sherbrooke
elaine.mosconi@usherbrooke.ca
Abayomi Baiyere
Queen’s University
baiyere@queensu.ca
Lauri Wessel
European University Viadrina Frankfurt
wessel@europa-uni.de
- Ecosystems and Business Models
• Innovative business models and strategies leveraging AI ecosystems
• Decision-making frameworks
• Human-centric design principles, transparency, and user orientation
• Regulation, bias mitigation, and governance challenges for AI ecosystems
• Role of AI in integrating digital platforms and ecosystems - Assistant and Agent Networks
• Collaborative problem-solving and coordination
• Communication and coordination mechanisms
• Emergent behaviors and adaptive strategies
• Trust, reliability, and security - Platforms
• Structural analysis and intelligence of platforms and their ecosystems
• Architecture and governance of single as well as networked digital platforms
• Design, implementation, and management methodologies in platform and ecosystem settings
• Applications across diverse sectors including e-health, education, engineering, finance, and public administration - Multimodal AI Assistants and Agents
• Integration of text, voice, and visual processing capabilities
• Generative models for multimodal content creation and processing
• Cross-modal learning and understanding
• Design and evaluation of multimodal interaction paradigms and user experiences
• Performance metrics and methodologies for assessing multimodal systems - Autonomous AI Capabilities:
• Large-scale generative models in autonomous systems
• Risk assessment, management, and strategies for human oversight
• Ethical considerations, responsible governance, and transparency in autonomous AI
• Digital co-worker functionalities and the augmentation of human roles - Extended Reality Integration
• Deployment of AI assistants within virtual, augmented, and mixed reality environments
• Spatial computing applications and immersive interaction paradigms
• Design of XR-enabled collaborative workspaces integrating AI functionalities
• Synergies between automation and immersive technologies - Economic and Societal Impact
• Economic, ecological, and social impacts of AI ecosystems
• Organizational and workforce transformations driven by AI integration
• Implications of AI ecosystems for productivity, workplace transformation, and human-AI interaction
• Ethics, legal, transparency, security, privacy, and trust within AI ecosystems
• Broader social, cultural, and policy implications of AI ecosystem evolution
Authors of selected papers will be invited to submit a revised version of their conference paper to the Electronic Markets journal – The International Journal on Networked Business after presentation at the conference.
Minitrack Co-chairs:
Rainer Schmidt (Primary Contact)
Munich University of Applied Sciences
Rainer.Schmidt@hm.edu
Rainer Alt
Leipzig University
rainer.alt@uni‐leipzig.de
Alfred Zimmermann
Reutlingen University
alfred.zimmermann@reutlingen-university.de
AI-enabled technologies have been permeating human lives and societies at a growing rate over the last three decades. They started at the mechanical task levels (e.g., manufacturing robots) and slowly made their way into analytical tasks (e.g., personal assistants, traders, schedulers, etc.). However, these technologies are still finding their way into the realm of human emotion and empathy. This next wave (known under various banners, including feeling AI, empathic AI, emotional AI, and empathetic AI) is expected to be the next frontier in AI development and deployment, making it a growing research area within AI research. Additionally, these developments are tainted by the lack of explainability of the AI system decision-making process. As a result, the relationship between AI explainability and human emotions has been under-studied.
This forward-looking minitrack welcomes all kinds of theoretical and empirical research at the intersection of human cognition, emotions, empathy, and AI. Possible topics and research questions of interest include but are not limited to:
- How does AI explainability influence human emotions?
• What is the relationship between AI explainability levels and desired emotions in humans (trust, joyfulness, satisfaction, etc.)?
• What would be the desired level of explanation for different individuals or user groups?
• What would be the desired level of explanation for different kinds of decisions? - Emotional AI Impact on Businesses and Organizations
• How emotionally capable AI will impact business processes, business models, and outcomes?
• How would an emotional generative AI impact employee and user satisfaction?
• How can organizations harness the existing generative AI emotional capabilities to gain competitive advantages?
• How would emotional and emphatic AI impact government and public agency procedures and policies? - Human and AI interactions
• How is an AI capable of understanding and appropriately responding to human emotions going to impact existing theories of human-technology interactions?
• How AI can become empathic and emotional, and how such changes are going to impact human-AI interactions (Novel theories).
• How might AI-evoked emotions in humans be different than those emotions evoked by other humans and living beings? - Emotional AI and Socio-Economical Systems
• What would be the legal and ethical implications of emotional and empathic AI for human societies and socio-economical systems?
• What are the potential advantages and risks associated with the development and deployment of emotional and empathic AI systems?
• What would be the role of AI explainability in this area? - AI Algorithms and Emotion Detection and Prediction
• How can AI and ML algorithms be better trained to detect and respond to human emotions appropriately?
• How does generative AI detect and affect user emotions? And how can it be improved?
• How people react emotionally to explanations provided by generative AI?
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Reza Vaezi (Primary Contact)
Kennesaw State University
svaezi@kennesaw.edu
Maryam Ghasemaghaei
McMaster University
ghasemm@mcmaster.ca
Mohsen Jozani
Augusta University
mjozani@augusta.edu
In recent years, circular industrial ecosystems have emerged as transformative enablers for enhanced data exchange in manufacturing, logistics, supply chain management, and beyond. These ecosystems leverage emerging collaborative and web-based technologies – such as digital twins, extended reality, and secure data-sharing infrastructures – to drive digitization and convergence with AI tools, foster trust, and improve transparency across industries. Advanced data analytics and machine learning further enhance these ecosystems by optimizing resource flows, predicting risks and demand patterns, and facilitating autonomous coordination among stakeholders. Thus, they create a collaborative environment for a continuous provision of information that fulfills the main requirement for a circular economy. Despite their potential, significant challenges remain in designing, implementing, and scaling these ecosystems to address critical issues, including data sovereignty, open-source innovation, and resilient value chain operations.
This minitrack invites submissions that explore innovative technologies, novel business models, and data-driven approaches shaping the future of circular industrial ecosystems. We welcome empirical studies, theoretical advancements, and comprehensive reviews that provide fresh perspectives and practical solutions to advance this field. This minitrack welcomes papers addressing, but not limited to, the following themes:
- Artificial Intelligence & Retrieval Augmented Generation in Industrial Ecosystems, e.g., to enhance decision-making, predictive analytics, and process automation within circular industrial ecosystems.
- Data Sovereignty & Trust in Ecosystems through governance models, data privacy frameworks, and secure data exchange and portability techniques.
- Digital Twins in Circular Systems, including design principles, synchronization mechanisms, AI-powered agents, and shared digital twins to drive operational efficiency and integration.
- Web 4.0 Technologies to ensure open, fair, trustworthy, secure, and inclusive digital environments for industrial applications.
- Open-Source Innovation & Business Models exploring the impact of open-source strategies on adoption, innovation, and creating innovative business models across industries.
- Resilience and Sustainability in Value Chain Networks utilizing collaborative platforms and decentralized systems to enhance value chain resilience, adaptability, and circularity through data-driven insights and web-based technologies.
- Decentralized & Secure Technologies & Data Spaces integrating interoperable infrastructures, data spaces, blockchain, and other decentralized solutions to enable secure and efficient data sharing across ecosystems, e.g., for FinTech applications in industrial ecosystems.
- Data Acquisition, Preparation, & Storage techniques to feed smart service systems and collaborative platform concepts in industrial operations.
- Digital Product Passports for the continuous provision of information within the circular economy.
- System Engineering & Modeling Techniques for the conceptualization of circular ecosystems.
- Data Readiness Frameworks to include extensive data sets in data processing applications.
- Industrial Metaverse & Simulation to achieve transparency and optimization along circular value chains.
- Digital Technologies and data-driven approaches for creating a circular and smart economy.
This minitrack seeks contributions from academics, industry practitioners, and policymakers at the forefront of industrial digitization and ecosystem design. Whether focusing on conceptual frameworks, empirical insights, or innovative prototypes, we welcome submissions with practical relevance and forward-looking perspectives.
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Hendrik van der Valk (Primary Contact)
TU Dortmund University
hendrik.van-der-valk@tu-dortmund.de
Tan Gürpinar
Quinnipiac University
tan.gurpinar@quinnipiac.edu
Nick Große
TU Dortmund University
nick.grosse@tu-dortmund.de
Joachim Hunker
Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering
joachim.hunker@isst.fraunhofer.de
This minitrack explores the design, innovation, and impacts of collaborative platforms in crowdfunding, gig economies, and online communities. It emphasizes algorithmic fairness, user engagement, and sustainability, offering new insights into platform economics and socio-technical challenges. Key trends identified in recent papers are listed below.
- Integration of AI (e.g., generative AI in reviews, crowdfunding algorithms)
- Examination of gig economies and decentralized systems.
- Exploration of social influence (e.g., equity, diversity, and herding behavior).
- Emerging focus on fairness, governance, and sustainability in platform design.
Selected outstanding manuscripts from this minitrack may be recommended to the editors of Data and Information Management to be fast-tracked for the review process.
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Ni Nina Huang (Primary Contact)
University of Miami
nhuang@miami.edu
Bin Gu
Boston University
bgu@bu.edu
Pei-yu Chen
Arizona State University
peiyu.chen@asu.edu
Kevin (Yili) Hong
University of Miami
khong@miami.edu
Data – recognized as the new oil – are increasingly becoming a critical resource for business success. Companies must ensure leveraging data to optimize internal business processes and create new business opportunities. That applies to traditional incumbents and digital natives alike. The former must ensure to stay competitive and avoid losing touch with the changing market, for example, by using data from physical assets (e.g., machines) to offer new digital services. The latter can leverage the green-field advantage and generate completely novel solutions from scratch, such as establishing data ecosystems that enable different actors (e.g., public institutions, companies, and academia) to share data for reciprocal benefit. With this comes a set of challenges. For example, unlike physical assets, data are reproducible at almost zero marginal cost and technical effort.
This minitrack focuses on exploring the fundamentals of data ecosystems from multiple perspectives, including studies that discover the meaning of data sharing in ecosystems for its stakeholders (e.g., data producers, providers, or consumers) or the classification of ecosystems. We expect contributions examining issues relating to the business value of data ecosystems within different domains (e.g., mobility, healthcare, manufacturing, logistics) and the use of various underpinning technologies (e.g., artificial intelligence or blockchain). Complementarily, we invite contributions exploring data sharing as well as the associated rules and governance mechanisms. Lastly, we like to encourage submission tackling socially relevant challenges by means of data ecosystems, such as sustainability(17 Sustainable Development Goals), security, and privacy.
This minitrack invites papers investigating the field of data ecosystems both empirically and theoretically, such as but not limited to:
- Classifications of data ecosystems and data sharing mechanisms
- Generative AI for data generation and sharing
- Paradigmatic differences between data ecosystems and traditional business networks
- Economic, ecological, and social sustainability of data ecosystems
- Analysis of domain-specific characteristics of data ecosystems
- Analysis of technology-specific characteristics of data ecosystems
- Design and modeling of data ecosystems
- Business models in data ecosystems
- Impact of data ecosystems on stakeholders
- Data sharing fundamentals
- Data sovereignty and usage control policies in data ecosystems
- Generative AI in data ecosystems
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Frederik Möller (Primary Contact)
TU Braunschweig
frederik.moeller@tu-braunschweig.de
Ilka Jussen-Lengersdorf
Fraunhofer ISST
ilka.jussen-lengersdorf@isst.fraunhofer.de
Thorsten Schoormann
Roskilde University
tschoormann@ruc.dk
Gero Strobel
University of Duisburg-Essen
Gero.Strobel@paluno.uni-due.de
The business environment in which companies must compete today is changing more than ever. Increasingly dynamic customer demands, external disruptions and shocks, more frequent material shortages and the worsening effects of climate change are putting additional pressure on global supply chains. Increasing flexibility and agility and improving the responsiveness and resilience of established supply chains are necessary to remain competitive. In the long term, the only way to address the increasing scarcity of materials for a variety of reasons is to transform today’s “take, make, waste” supply chains into much more sustainable circular systems.
Digitalization is undoubtedly a key enabler for the implementation and management of resilient and sustainable supply chains. This minitrack explores the transformative role of digital technologies, including IoT, AI, digital twins, blockchains, and digital platforms in developing, planning, executing, and controlling resilient and sustainable supply chains. It addresses challenges such as increasing supply chain volatility, resource scarcity and climate change by highlighting data-driven innovations, optimization, and new business models. Therefore, we welcome research papers including but not limited to the following aspects:
- Contribution of digital technologies to supply chain resilience, sustainability and circularity
- Increasing supply chain visibility based on IoT technologies
- AI methods supporting forecasting, planning, decision making and optimization
- Division of labour and interactions between humans and machines in AI-supported SCs
- Virtualization and simulation of supply chains based on digital twins
- Blockchain and smart contracts in logistics and supply chain management
- The role of digital platforms in supply chain management
- Effects of smart product-service-systems on supply chains and supply chain management
- Federated data ecosystems enabling new data-driven supply chain strategies
- Models, methods and tools for the digitalization of supply chains
- Barriers and challenges hindering the digitalization of supply chains
- Data security and cyber security challenges in digital supply chain structures
- Governance structures and legal aspects within the digital supply chain
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Alexander Pflaum (Primary Contact)
Otto-Friedrich University Bamberg
alexander.pflaum@uni-bamberg.de
Günter Prockl
Copenhagen Business School
gp.digi@cbs.dk
Freimut Bodendorf
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg
freimut.bodendorf@fau.de
Haozhe Chen
Iowa State University
hzchen@iastate.edu
Esports is a rapidly growing area of research, presenting both opportunities and challenges. Despite significant progress, esports research offers numerous occasions for academics and industry professionals to examine electronic games and their impact on people and societies worldwide. Over the last few decades, esports has grown into a multi-billion dollar sector within the larger video gaming industry. The number of esports players, games, organized events, both online and in-person viewership, and the growing professionalization of the industry continues to grow, despite facing numerous challenges to its business, the growth and changing nature of technology, and the time players are able to allocate to play. Esports momentum as a popular mainstream competitive recreational activity, career, and entertainment has grown through collaboration with movies, singers and rappers, as well as sports and its athletes. And while analogue sports continue to draw large numbers of viewers and generate substantial revenue, digital sports are on the rise, merging videogame and esports’ technical and networked know-how with sports.
Furthermore, as electronic gaming technology (e.g., augmented reality, virtual reality, the “metaverse”) continues to develop at a rapid pace, there is substantial potential for esports development as a dominant and technically advanced sports world globally. All fields of esports and electronic games research need to keep pace with esports advancement, recognizing the global reach of this play-based activity across layers of society. Moreover, there are abundant opportunities for collaboration with related fields such as technology development, game development, internet policy, gamification, and tools for connectivity and the digital economy.
This minitrack aims to provide insight into all areas of esports’ theoretical development and practical understanding, without excluding any methodological approach or scientific disciplines. Conceptual, theoretical, empirical, and methodological contributions that enrich our understanding of esports are welcome. Given the diverse goals of this minitrack, possible topics include, but are not limited to:
- Business, e.g. discovering esports consumers’ motivations; designing effective marketing tools; understanding players’/esports’ networks and organizations; gamers/fans as consumers.
- Cognitive Science/Psychology, e.g. studying factors influencing athletes’ performance; their abilities and skills; cognitive and behavioral differences between athletes.
- IT and Computer Science, e.g. using game telemetry, biometrics, user-generated data, or text mining to study esports, e.g. team dynamics, interactions of players; in-game performance.
- Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality, e.g., developing AI-powered game analytics; creating inteligent training systems for players.; machine learning; VR technology for immersive spectator experiences and player training simulations.
- Law, e.g. copyright issues, IT solutions for anti-corruption and integrity
- Sociology and Anthropolgy, e.g. governance, online ethics, gamers’ and athletes’ interactions, experiences, and identities; live events and streaming dynamics; gender issues (gender gap).
- Media Studies, e.g. relations between esports, traditional sports, and the media; offline spaces versus live-streaming, understanding esports in terms of virtual versus real; how technology mediates gaming, and how esports’ communities fit here.
- Sport Science, e.g., comparing esports and ‘traditional’ sports; esports as ‘real’, ‘genuine’ sports or new quality.
Accepted research will be considered for publication in a special issue of the Journal of Electronic Gaming and Esports (JEGE).
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Piotr Siuda (Primary Contact)
Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz
piotr.siuda@ukw.edu.pl
David Hedlund
St. John’s University
hedlundd@stjohns.edu
Emma Witkowski
RMIT University
Emma.witkowski@rmit.edu.au
Lindsey Darvin
Syracuse University
ledarvin@syr.edu
From the organizational perspective Generative AI (GenAI) significantly impacts collaboration across various levels, including organizational, project/team, and individual levels. It offers unique advantages and introduces notable challenges. This technology facilitates innovative partnerships ranging from bilateral collaborations to complex AI-driven ecosystems. GenAI revolutionizes organizational collaboration by automating repetitive tasks and augmenting human capabilities through co-intelligence. It is crucial to investigate its role in partner selection, specifically how it ensures strategic alignment, technological compatibility, and mutual trust. Furthermore, it is important to explore the outcomes of GenAI on organizational collaboration. For instance, how adopting AI solutions enhances value co-creation with external partners by streamlining communication, empowering stakeholders, and strengthening social networks. Additionally, at the project level, it is necessary to study how AI reduces failure rates by improving decision-making, mitigating risks, and optimizing resource allocation.
From a human-centric societal perspective, as these AI systems become more pervasive in our daily lives, it is crucial to examine how they may impact the essential fabric of human existence – the relationships between friends, romantic partners, family members, coworkers, ingroup and outgroup members, communities, and cultural groups. GenAI has the capability to act as a new type of “relationship” for individuals, potentially replacing or complementing traditional human-to-human interactions. For example, GenAI is already being used to simulate and complement human interactions, alleviating loneliness but also probably reducing genuine human interactions.
Furthermore, there is a growing consensus among AI researchers that cognitive architectures will play a pivotal role in the future development of GenAI. However, Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit significant limitations in several respect, such as social and emotional intelligence, commonsense reasoning, and context understanding. The above-mentioned research areas raise important questions including but (by far) not limited to:
- From an organizational perspective: How might GenAI for partner selection and evaluation affect trust between companies in inter-organizational collaborations? What are the potential impacts, both positive and negative, of human-AI interactions on the physical and mental health of employees, especially when these interactions substitute for human-human interactions? How could GenAI influence the balance between knowledge sharing and the protection of sensitive information in complex multi-partner collaborations? What role does GenAI play in bridging cultural gaps in international joint ventures, and how does it contribute to building trust? What challenges and opportunities arise from using GenAI as a knowledge broker in collaborative environments, particularly regarding knowledge management and protection against opportunistic behavior?
- From a human-centric societal perspective: How might GenAI as diagnostic tools or decision-making aids affect trust in institutions and professionals, such as in the medical field? How might AI-powered matchmaking platforms challenge the traditional expectations of (romantic) partnerships? What are the potential impacts, both positive and negative, of human-AI interactions on physical and mental health, as these interactions potentially substitute for human-human interactions?
- From a neuro AI and cognitive perspective: How can cognitive architectures be designed to bridge the gap between human-like intelligence and artificial systems? What are the key components and processes necessary for developing robust cognitive architectures in (Gen)AI? How can cognitive architectures enhance the explainability and transparency of (Gen)AI systems? What approaches can be employed to imbue (Gen)AI systems with social-emotional intelligence comparable to that of humans? How can (Gen)AI systems be trained to understand and appropriately respond to emotional cues in various social contexts? What are the potential applications and implications of socially emotionally intelligent (Gen)AI in real-world scenarios?
The minitrack welcomes sociotechnical contributions that address, but are not limited to, the following research areas:
- Organizational Collaboration Perspectives of GenAI:
• Empirical studies examining how the use of GenAI for partner selection and evaluation affects trust between companies
• Design of GenAI-powered systems that influence the balance between knowledge sharing and the protection of sensitive information in complex multi-partner collaborations
• Empirical investigations into the potential impacts of human-(Gen)AI interactions on the physical and mental health of employees
• Empirical studies on the role of GenAI in bridging cultural gaps in international joint ventures and its contribution to building trust
• Design of GenAI-mediated communication and collaboration tools that enhance organizations’ innovation capabilities through improved collaboration and communication processes with external partners
• Design of GenAI as a knowledge broker in collaborative environments, focusing on knowledge management and protection against opportunistic behavior
• Empirical studies on the implementation of formal and informal governance mechanisms in inter-organizational collaborations supported by GenAI, and its impact on the sustainability and success of such partnerships - Human-centric Societal Perspective on Relationships with GenAI as Partner:
• Empirical studies examining the impact of GenAI on trust in institutions, professionals, and decision-making processes
• Design principles that foster transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness in human-GenAI interactions
• Investigations into the effects of GenAI-generated content on intergroup perceptions, stereotypes, and prejudice
• Investigation into the integration of GenAI into social media platforms, examining how it transforms individual relationships and its implications for social structures and cultural norms
• Investigations into the psychological, social, and physiological impacts of human-GenAI interactions, particularly in the context of substituting human-human interactions
• Design principles that promote healthy and meaningful human-AI relationships, fostering social connectedness and emotional well-being - Multidisciplinary Cognitive Architecture Perspective for AI and GenAI Development:
• Empirical research on how cognitive architectures can enhance the explainability and transparency of (Gen)AI systems
• Design of approaches to imbue (Gen)AI systems with social-emotional intelligence comparable to that of humans
• Empirical studies on how (Gen)AI systems can be trained to understand and appropriately respond to emotional cues in various social contexts
• Empirical advancements necessary to improve the commonsense reasoning capabilities of GenAI systems
• Empirical research on the role of context in the development of more adaptive and responsive (Gen)AI systems
• Investigations into how trust and empathy can be cultivated in human-(Gen)AI interactions to ensure harmonious and effective collaboration
• Empirical studies on the foreseeable challenges in the development and deployment of advanced cognitive architectures in (Gen)AI
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Frank Bodendorf (Primary Contact)
Research and Innovation Center BMW Group Headquarters Germany
frank.BF.bodendorf@bmw.de
Thomas Kude
University of Bamberg
thomas.kude@uni-bamberg.de
In modern sociotechnical systems, digital commons, as the co-production of data or knowledge and community via networked systems, are increasingly prevalent and visible. Along with the people and digital resources produced, governance regarding participation, access, and use of data and knowledge is necessary to foster engagement. Such commons governance is polycentric, with many centers of decision-making, addressing both dilemmas associated with underlying knowledge resources and dilemmas associated with shared communication and coordination strategies needed to produce effective governance itself.
From platforms dedicated to crowd-sourcing and online creation communities—including MTurk, Upwork, Wikipedia, and FoldIt—to emergent subcommunities dedicated to everything from social movements to niche hobbies, via Facebook Groups or specific Toks, modern networked interactions produce significant information resources as digital commons. This minitrack will explore community governance of innovation and creativity, immaterial resources long associated with intellectual property from an interdisciplinary perspective. Case studies across a broad range of social, cultural, and economic contexts are invited; empirical documentation of knowledge commons governance, dilemmas, and shared resource management in communities may be informed by institutional theory, such as the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) or Governing Knowledge Commons (GKC) frameworks. The minitrack also welcomes critiques and theorization regarding data and knowledge commons in the digital economy. Potential governance topics include:
- Collective action problems in the modern digital economy
- Community management of deepfakes, misinformation, and online manipulation
- Crowd sourcing
- Data governance and protection
- Digital ownership
- Knowledge commons
- Online collaboration and creation communities
- Peer production
- Social norm formation, such as around privacy, security, or community expectations
- Subcommunities on online platforms
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo (Primary Contact)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
madelyns@illinois.edu
Brett M Frischmann
Villanova University
brett.frischmann@law.villanova.edu
Michael J Madison
University of Pittsburgh
madison@pitt.edu
Katherine J Strandburg
New York University
katherine.strandburg@nyu.edu
Digitalization has heavily disrupted how the hospitality and tourism industry delivers and markets its services, how work processes are organized, and how offerings are consumed. By adopting, adapting, or developing Information Systems (IS), hospitality and tourism organizations and their use of technology continually undergo a substantial transformation, often referred to as “digital transformation”. The tourism and hospitality industry are volatile, and constantly changing which have resulted in disrupted business models, the need to understand and embrace emerging platforms, and new technology use by consumers.
As we have moved into a post-pandemic phase, the hospitality and tourism industry is facing a new era where the conditions for the hospitality and tourism industry are reshaped through new realities like labor shortages, new work models (digital nomadism, work-from-home), inflation, political uncertainties, new leisure and travel patterns, and increasing tourism phobia among local residents. Furthermore, the ongoing debate on sustainability and climate change are also creating challenges for the industry. Also, the increased use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is starting to gain a great deal of attention in the hospitality and tourism industry. The challenges and concerns are related to service robots, tourism models, augmented reality, virtual reality, and biometrics. Like other industries, there are also challenges with AI related to the interaction between both employees and customers. Thus, there is a need to develop practical and conceptual knowledge on the role of digital transformation in meeting these challenges and developing an industry that is resilient and sustainable.
For this minitrack, we seek to attract research contributions that extend existing research by focusing on socio-technical, organizational, managerial and/ or individual challenges of digital disruption and digital transformation in the hospitality and tourism industry. We welcome conceptual, empirical, and design- oriented contributions on macro, meso and micro levels of analysis for this mini- track. Potential topics include:
- Digital business strategy
- Digital business model development
- Big data analysis for strategic decision making
- Platform economy
- Smart tourism development
- Quality management and reputation management strategies
- Social media and online reviews
- Digital change management for the future of the tourism and hospitality industry
- Strategic digital innovation for the tourism and hospitality industry
- Digital communication and guest decision making
- Role of technology in regenerative tourism
- Responsible technology for tourism and hospitality
- Metaverse tourism
- Automation in tourism and hospitality, from innovation, marketing and service delivery to service recovery
- Digital transformation and organizational resilience in tourism and hospitality
- Technology-free tourism
- Crisis recovery and digitalization in tourism and hospitality
- Other related topics
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Karin Högberg (Primary Contact)
University West and Griffith University
Karin.hogberg@hv.se
Ulrike Gretzel
University of Southern California
ugretzel@gmail.com
This minitrack investigates the evolving landscape of HCI, emphasizing usability, user trust, and design in diverse digital ecosystems. Topics include innovative interface designs, user behavior analytics, the role of AI in interactions, and HCI’s impact on organizational and societal contexts. Given the diverse goals of this mini-track, potential topics include, but are not limited to:
- Guidelines and standards for interface design
- Interface design for generative AI and prompt engineering
- Interface design of collaboration systems (group HCI)
- Design and evaluation issues for mobile devices and m-Commerce
- Interface design for FinTech applications
- Design issues related to the elderly, the young, and special needs populations
- Interface issues in the design and development of innovative interaction technologies
- Behavioral, neurophysiological, and design aspects of human-computer interaction and user behavior analytics
- Neuroscientific approaches to human-computer interaction
- Using information and sensors to detect user states (e.g., emotion, cognitive conflict) and create more intelligent interfaces
- The impact of interfaces on attitudes, emotion, perception, behavior, productivity, and performance
- Factors influencing usability (i.e., friction reduction), ease-of-use and the overall user experience
- Information systems usability engineering
- Design of online choice architectures
- Web-based user interface design and evaluation
- Impact of digital nudges on online judgment and decision-making
- Impact of behavioral economics principles and website design implementation on privacy and trust
- Website designs/elements that encourage rational thinking and/or nudge users into certain behaviors
- Novel forms of authentication and authorization (e.g., using mousing or typing dynamics)
- Issues related to teaching HCI courses
- Ethical issues related to the capture of Personally Identifiable Information (PII), behavioral biometric data, and nudging
There are opportunities for best papers of this minitrack to be fast-tracked to AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction.
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Christoph Schneider (Primary Contact)
IESE Business School
cschneider@iese.edu
Joe Valacich
University of Arizona
valacich@arizona.edu
Jeffrey Jenkins
Brigham Young University
jeffrey_jenkins@byu.edu
Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah
Singapore Management University
fionanah@smu.edu.sg
This minitrack serves as a place for researchers and practitioners from diverse background to share their research and ideas. There are a variety of important issues and topics of importance, such as new technology and visual design advancements to digital humans, the behavioral, emotional, and even physical responses of the users while interacting with digital humans, the underlying cognitive processes underlying the interactions, the impact of digital humans on the firm level or industry level, and ethical issues and societal considerations of the application of digital humans. Research could be wide-ranging, such as rich descriptive statistics, theories, emergent and innovative topics, models and frameworks related to technologies and their impact on marketing, case studies, methods, qualitative research, etc. The topics include but are not limited to:
- Visualization technology to advance digital humans
- Challenges and problems with creating digital humans or scanning and sampling users.
- Human-computer interactions, instilled with digital humans, including affective computing issues.
- Design of digital humans by combining human and computer cognitive power.
- Use of GANs and VAEs to infer digital human faces, including approaches building on ‘Deep Fakes’ technology.
- Analysis of machine learning, big data, data mining, and other underlying technologies and algorithms of digital humans
- Taxonomy of digital humans
- Virtual influencers and YouTube digital celebrities
- Impact of digital humans on the individual level (decision-making, problem-solving, negotiation, and creativity/innovation)
- Psychological and emotional effects of interacting with realistic digital humans
- Biases in interacting with digital humans and biases in the digital humans deployed
- The use of digital humans beyond individuals and its consequences in organizations
- Management of deployment (e.g., corporate governance, data management)
- Case studies on industry adoption of digital humans
- Use and economic implications of digital humans in e-commerce, social media, and the combinations of multiple industries involving e-commerce and social media.
- Social impact and ethics related to digital humans and their use
- Philosophical questions surrounding the idea of ‘using’ digital humans
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Lingyao Yuan (Primary Contact)
Iowa State University
lyuan@iastate.edu
Mike Seymour
University of Sydney
mike.seymour@sydney.edu.au
A. Benedikt Brendel
Indiana University
alfbrend@iu.edu
This minitrack explores the adoption, diffusion, and impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) across sectors. It focuses on societal, organizational, and technological transformation driven by emerging technologies, such as blockchain, Internet of Things (IoT), and AI. This minitrack highlights diverse applications, adoption dynamics, and the socio-economic consequences of ICTs and AI. Recent studies emphasize the pivotal role of ICTs in addressing societal challenges, including digital inclusion, sustainability, and the interplay of digital transformation with traditional practices. They highlight diverse applications of AI, IoT, and blockchain in areas such as healthcare, education, and governance, reflecting the transformative societal impact of technology adoption and diffusion. Organizations are also adopting, using and diffusing various ICTs including blockchain, IoT, Generative AI.
Therefore, this minitrack seeks papers that employ diverse research approaches, such as case studies, experiments, literature reviews, empirical, comparative and applied research related to the use, adoption, impacts and diffusion of ICTs and AI, which are emerging and evolving rapidly. The minitrack aims to provide a platform for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to share their insights, experiences, and perspectives on the transformative potential of ICTs and AI, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and advancing our understanding of the societal, organizational, and technological implications of these technologies. Topics and research areas included are, but are not limited to:
- The adoption, use, impact and diffusion of ICTs including broadband internet, mobile smart devices, electronic commerce, wearables, online social networks, and other technologies by households, organizations, communities, or society
- The adoption, use, impact and diffusion of any novel, innovative and emerging ICT applications including social commerce, cloud services, AI, Generative AI, machine learning, deep learning, blockchain, cryptocurrency, virtual reality, augmented reality or IoT within large enterprises, small-and-medium sized enterprises (SMEs), communities, and society
- The adoption, use, impact and diffusion of ICTs that enable organizations and government to enhance their environmental and social impacts
- Evaluation of the technological and non-technological aspects of the adoption, use impacts and diffusion of ICTs
- Application of theories to explore, describe, explain and predict the adoption, use, impacts and diffusion of ICTs
- Human Computer Interaction issues associated with adoption, use, and impact factors in the context of ICTs
- Economics of the adoption, use or diffusion of ICTs in society and in households
- Working practices and their association with adoption, use and diffusion within organizations
- Resistance to change related to ICT adoption, use and diffusion within society and organizations
- Policies related to adoption, use and diffusion of broadband and emerging ICTs
- Conceptual or empirical studies of how a particular ICT is adopted, used and diffused in developing countries or within a specific community
- Comparative studies of ICT adoption, use, impact and diffusion between demographic groups, countries or regions
- Luminal innovation, assimilation, resistance and changes to working practices that will duly inform the research community
- Studies of the digital divide that include disadvantaged groups such as disabled and lower income families.
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Jyoti Choudrie (Primary Contact)
University of Hertfordshire
j.choudrie@herts.ac.uk
Sherah Kurnia
University of Melbourne
sherahk@unimelb.edu.au
David Sundaram
University of Auckland
d.sundaram@auckland.ac.nz
This minitrack explores the interplay between information systems (IS) and evolving regulatory frameworks. Submissions may explore how organizations navigate and comply with regulations (e.g., in IS design), the relationship between innovation and regulation, but also the role of the IS discipline in influencing existing and emerging regulations. In this regard, regulatory frameworks (e.g., European AI Act, California Consumer Privacy Act, European General Data Protection Regulation, Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act) or specific normative aims (e.g., privacy, fairness, transparency, or accountability) may be valuable for inquiry. This minitrack welcomes all conceptual, empirical, and theoretical studies that examine this interdisciplinary topic.Possible relevant topics for this minitrack might include, but are not limited to:
- Reciprocal influence of IS on regulation (e.g., regarding data protection)
- Increasing focus on AI regulations (e.g., European AI Act)
- Regulatory compliance in IS design
- Impact of regulation on organizations (e.g., ecosystems, enterprise architectures, AI systems)
- Studies at the intersection of IS and law (e.g., novel interdisciplinary approaches)
- Comparative analysis of global regulatory frameworks
- Governance strategies and practices for lawful IS
- Privacy implications of distributed data processing among multiple actors
- Utilizing AI for compliance with legal requirements
- Detrimental effects from legal frameworks (e.g., on innovation)
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Christian Kurtz (Primary Contact)
Universität Hamburg
christian.kurtz@uni-hamburg.de
Fabian Burmeister
Universität Hamburg
fabian.burmeister@uni-hamburg.de
Tobias Mast
Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut
t.mast@leibniz-hbi.de
Niva Elkin-Koren
Tel Aviv University
elkiniva@tauex.tau.ac.il
This minitrack investigates behavioral aspects of IS security and privacy, focusing on human-centric risks, decision-making processes, and strategies to mitigate internal and external threats. Topics include compliance, threat responses, and the influence of emerging technologies like AI and generative tools.
The focus is on internal and external threats influenced by human behavior. This includes research on fear appeals and motivation in security compliance, generative AI’s role in mitigating threats, cognitive heuristics and decision-making in phishing and cyber resilience, and behavioral (cognitive or affective) biases affecting IS security. Topics include, but are not limited to:
- Creative rigorous investigations of actual user security behavior, both positive and negative
- Detecting and mitigating insider threats
- The impact of AI on personal data privacy and regulatory responses
- Security policy compliance research – motivations, antecedents, levers of influence
- Research contrasting policy compliance with actual secure behaviors
- Analysis of known and unknown modes and vectors of internal and external attack
- Explorations of the impact of generative AI and ML/LLM on security outcomes, for all stakeholders, including employees, citizens and organizations.
- SETA (security education, training, and awareness) programs
- Frameworks for assessing the effectiveness of interventions that intend to reduce organizational vulnerability to attacks
- Cyber security professionals harnessing AI to enhance defense
- Modeling of security and privacy behavioral phenomena and relationships
- Studies examining privacy-related behaviors from a “privacy paradox” perspective
- Merging methodological topics related to addressing research strategies in IS security
- Translational science perspectives and strategies for IS security/privacy research
- Theory development, theory building, and theory testing in information security
- Neurosecurity (NeuroIS) investigations of information security behavior
- Explorations of emerging issues related to the privacy and security of the “Internet of Things” (ioT)
- Role of AI in facilitating cybersecurity defenses
- Consumer perceptions of privacy and trust in digital platforms
This mintrack will provide IS/IT researchers a collaborative forum to share their research approaches. We hope to attract the skills and insights of scholars from a wide set of disciplines, presenting a mix of theoretical and applied papers on threats and mitigation. Areas of research may include the following.
- Research related to insider threats to information security and privacy represent the first and most important thread for the minitrack. Insider threats include activities ranging from non-malicious and non-volitional behaviors (accidents and oversights) to volitional, but not malicious, actions to malicious actions such as theft, fraud, blackmail, sabotage, and embezzlement.
- External vectors of attack by individuals and organizations outside the security perimeter represent the second thread for this minitrack. Specific topics of interest include hacker behaviors, cyber-warfare, identity theft (and electronic deception), and cyber-espionage, including most offensive and defensive methods of prevention, detection, and remediation. Other external parties are motivated to use IT to damage or steal trade secrets, national security information, sensitive account information, or other valuable assets.
- A third thread revolves around security policy compliance, both at the individual and organizational level of analysis. Compliance is not merely a binary concept – it is a continuum. Individuals may minimally comply with formal security and privacy policies and procedures, or they may exhibit extra-role or stewardship behaviors that go above and beyond official compliance. Similarly, individuals may carelessly violate organizational security policies and procedures without malicious intent or they may attempt to cause maximum damage or loss. In some cases, compliant behavior may not be secure and truly secure behavior may constitute policy violation behavior, so more nuanced research designs are needed.
- Modeling and theory building in the context of IS security and privacy represents yet another interesting area. Theoretical development in information systems security and privacy research is immature relative to other areas of study in the information systems discipline. This sub-discipline of information systems continues to suffer from a limited theoretical base, restricting our collective ability to properly interpret reality, to apply appropriate methodological approaches, and to substantiate conclusions. Adaptation of theories from applied social psychology and criminology are particularly fertile areas for expanding our knowledge base in this domain. Theories from the disciplines of management, education, and others may also inform our understanding of the phenomena of interest.
- Finally, we have a particular interest in emerging, rigorous research methods for investigating these phenomena. Organizational-level research can be improved, but studies conducted at the individual level, in particular, can benefit from new experimental designs and new data collection methods. Examples include neurophysiological (NeuroIS) methods such as EEG or fMRI, the factorial survey method, mixed-methods designs, and simulations.
- The era of Artificial Intelligence is upon us, and it will change the cybersecurity landscape in significant ways. Organizations are likely to harness it to improve their detection mechanisms. On the other hand, cyber criminals are already using these tools to generate novel attacks, challenging all existing employee-focused training mechanisms and mandating a re-evaluation of these.
Select papers from this minitrack will be fast tracked by the minitrack chairs to the Journal of Intellectual Capital (Emerald Publishing)
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Merrill Warkentin (Primary Contact)
Mississippi State University
m.warkentin@msstate.edu
Karen Renaud
Strathclyde University
karen.renaud@strath.ac.uk
Allen Johnston
University of Alabama
ajohnston@cba.ua.edu
Anthony Vance
Virginia Tech
Anthony@Vance.name
Hiro Protagonist, a hacker and pizza delivery driver, fought to neutralize a deadly virus in the Metaverse in the cyberpunk novel Snow Crash. Almost coincidentally, as Snow Crash turned 30, one of the biggest companies in the world, Facebook, changed its name to Meta to reflect its focus on the Metaverse. Despite its infancy, the Metaverse has generated significant interest from users, practitioners, and researchers. Given its potential to transform the future of work and the consumer landscape by creating immersive experiences, Big Tech companies are investing not only in the underlying technology to enable the Metaverse but also in accompanying virtual products and services to create immersive experiences for users and help build intellectual capital within and between organizations.
The Metaverse is a decentralized, shared, immersive, and persistent virtual environment. It is afforded by socially constructed and materially enabled IT artifacts that allow users to have unique identities represented by their avatars and authentic interactions with other users, human-like AI agents, and virtual assets. In other words, the Metaverse is a connection between the real and virtual world where one can work, study, play, shop, travel, socialize, and accomplish many other daily activities similar to the physical world. The Metaverse offers various opportunities, from creating new revenue streams for businesses to reducing operational costs, enabling distributed training, and fostering intellectual capital. The Metaverse is also an extension of the physical world, with opportunities beyond what the physical world offers to individuals. Especially with the immersion capabilities of the current powerful standalone head-mounted extended reality (XR) displays, one can experience what is not usually possible, such as spending a day in ancient Greece, walking on Mars, or exploring the mysteries of Kīlauea, in the Metaverse.
While many opportunities exist for the Metaverse, it also has diverse challenges that may prevent successful adoption, such as surveillance, user tracking, deviant behavior (e.g., bullying and stalking), design issues, unintended consequences such as addiction, technostress, anxiety, and cognitive overload, and the new security and privacy threats. Our experiences from e-commerce, social media, and the Internet during the past decades necessitate a proactive approach to governance, regulations, design principles, data collection, physical-virtual world connection, and similar issues during the inception of the Metaverse.
This minitrack explores the transformative potential of the Metaverse, emphasizing opportunities for innovation, immersive experiences, and emerging business models. At the same time, it addresses critical challenges, including risks, unintended consequences, and the need for effective governance and regulatory frameworks. By addressing both opportunities and challenges, this minitrack aims to offer valuable insights into the impact of the Metaverse on users and organizations, as well as the policies and regulations necessary to ensure its responsible and ethical development.
The minitrack welcomes both theoretical and empirical studies employing diverse methodological approaches. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Challenges and Risks in the Metaverse:
• Cybersecurity and privacy threats
• New attack vectors and surfaces (e.g., adversarial AI, biometric data breaches)
• The Darkverse – illegal and criminal activities in the Metaverse (e.g., illicit markets, cybercrimes, money laundering)
• Anti-forensics techniques user by hackers to evade detection in the Metaverse
• Deception and deep fakes (e.g., AI-generated misinformation and identity fraud)
• Deviant behavior (e.g., harassment, bullying, stalking, organized trolling, radicalization)
• Ethical concerns and implications for freedom of expression in the Metaverse (e.g., user surveillance, tracking, and censorship)
• Adverse physical, mental, and emotional effects (e.g., addiction, technostress, cyberpsychoses, misuse, etc.)
• Unintended consequences of AI-driven moderation and personalization (e.g., algorithmic biases and digital discrimination)
• Weaponization of virtual spaces (e.g., the use of the Metaverse for social engineering, radicalization, and digital warfare)
• Psychological manipulation (e.g., exploitative game mechanics, behavioral reinforcement, and persuasive design for engagement, surveillance, or deception) - Opportunities and Innovations in the Metaverse:
• Novel and sustainable business models (e.g., meta-tourism, Metaverse in eCommerce)
• User-centric monetization strategies (e.g., play-to-earn, digital economies, tokenization)
• Cost reduction, operational efficiency, and improved firm performance through Metaverse adoption
• Corporate training, distributed learning, and virtual collaboration for improved team performance
• Knowledge creation, retention, and dissemination in immersive environments
• Metaverse applications (meta-apps) for healthcare (e.g., telemedicine, virtual therapy, rehabilitation)
• Mental and physical health benefits (e.g., meta-fitness, stress reduction, gamified wellness programs)
• Opportunities for vulnerable populations (e.g., improving accessibility for elderly individuals and people with disabilities)
• Positive behavioral reinforcement through gamification (e.g., reward systems for healthy habits, eco-conscious behavior, and social good initiatives in virtual environments) - Governance and Regulation of the Metaverse
• Intellectual property, copyright, and ownership
• Data privacy, transparency, anonymity, and virtual identities
• New standards, regulations, compliance, and governance mechanisms for the Metaverse
• Hardware (e.g., haptics, trackers) and software (e.g., digital twins, asset management) ecosystems
• Integration with complementary and enabling technologies (e.g., Blockchain, AI, NFT, XR, VR, AR, MR, IoT, wearables)
• Digital divide, accessibility, and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)
• Digital personas, avatars, and virtual assets
• Safeguarding and well-being of vulnerable populations (e.g., children, neurodivergent individuals, marginalized communities)
• Fairness in virtual environments
• Ethical AI and algorithmic accountability
• Metaverse governance frameworks and decentralized decision-making
• Public vs. private governance models
• Game-theoretic approaches to Metaverse policy and governance
We are delighted to offer a fast-track opportunity at the Journal of Intellectual Capital.
Minitrack Chairs:
Ersin Dincelli (Primary Contact)
University of Colorado Denver
ersin.dincelli@ucdenver.edu
Merrill Warkentin
Mississippi State University
m.warkentin@msstate.edu
Ayoung Suh
Sungkyunkwan University
aysuh@skku.edu
Paul Benjamin Lowry
Virginia Tech
Paul.Lowry.PhD@VT.edu
This minitrack focuses on understanding effective strategies for attracting customers, increasing their purchases, satisfaction and loyalty, as well as the responses and behavior of customers to various online marketing vehicles and consumer generated media.
We aim to provide a forum for open and vibrant discussion of innovative strategies and tools in digital marketing to shape consumer behavior, enhance engagement, and drive sustainable practices in B2B and B2C contexts. It focuses on personalization, persuasive design, and consumer trust in evolving digital landscapes. Some topics participants might consider (note this is not an exhaustive list):
- Green and sustainable marketing gaining traction in e-commerce.
- Visual product aesthetics influencing impulsive buying behaviors.
- Generative design elements enhancing digital engagement.
- Personalized strategies boosting consumer satisfaction and loyalty.
- Innovative approaches to building consumer trust and engagement.
Recent papers explore the intersection of AI, sustainability, and consumer behavior, including generative AI applications, eco-conscious purchasing, and personalization in digital marketing. Studies also emphasize emotional engagement, referral programs, and platform design to influence buyer behavior, reflecting innovation in both B2B and B2C contexts.
We invite submissions from academics, practitioners, policy makers, and independent thinkers. We welcome submissions that are theoretical, bibliometric, or empirical, i.e., experimental, field studies, case studies, models and modeling, ethnographic, netnographic, natural language processing (NPL), machine learning, or survey based. Each submission must reflect clarity, rigor, and novelty. The best submissions have the potential to spark stimulating discussion and encourage new research agendas. Bring your insights, your energy, and your desire to enrich the HICSS community and beyond!
Minitrack Co-Chairs:
Hope Jensen Schau (Primary Contact)
University of California Irvine
schauh@uci.edu
Melissa Akaka
University of Denver
Melissa.Akaka@du.edu
Martin Key
University of Colorado Colorado Springs
tmkey@ucss.edu
Advancements in computing technologies and algorithms are driving a new wave of innovation. In recent years, generative AI (Gen AI) and machine learning (ML) have achieved remarkable breakthroughs in areas such as chatbots, software development, autonomous driving, speech and facial recognition, and image and video generation.
As AI continues to evolve, businesses across industries are eager to harness its potential to improve operations, create value, and gain a competitive edge. However, successful AI adoption requires more than technical expertise—it also demands business insight and ethical responsibility. Since AI’s performance relies on the data it learns from, ensuring transparency and fairness is crucial. Moreover, as AI becomes deeply embedded in economic activities, its broader impact needs to be carefully assessed. How will automation reshape jobs, skills, wages, and labor markets? How will personalized recommendations influence business models and consumer behavior? What risks and challenges does AI pose for decision-making and society at large? These questions demand careful study in the years ahead to ensure AI benefits both businesses and society.
This minitrack examines the socio-economic impacts of AI and algorithmic systems, with a focus on business value, fairness, transparency, user behavior, and applications in operations, finance, healthcare, and digital platforms. It addresses human-AI interaction and systemic challenges in adopting AI technologies. While submissions employing ML algorithms are highly encouraged, they must also explore the broader impacts and implications of these technologies. We welcome both research-in-progress and practical studies that have the potential to make meaningful contributions to the business community. Relevant topics for this minitrack include, but are not limited to:
- User behavior, response, and reaction to algorithm fairness, bias, and aversion
- Economic and societal impacts/implications of AI and ML algorithms
- Digital platform and market design driven by algorithms
- The algorithmic economy
- AI agent
- Human-algorithm interaction and its implications
- Explainability, interpretability, and accountability in AI and ML
- Theory-driven development and evaluation of AI and ML algorithms
- AL and ML applications in fintech, operations, cybersecurity, healthcare, accounting
High quality and relevant papers from this minitrack will be selected for fast-tracked development towards Information Technology and Management. Selected papers will need to expand in content and length in line with the requirements for standard research articles published in the journal. Although the minitrack co-chairs are committed to guiding the selected papers towards final publication, further reviews may be needed before a final publication decision can be made.
Minitrack Chair:
Zhongju John Zhang
Arizona State University
Zhongju.Zhang@asu.edu